Trending Now
Do WNBA Players Really Want to Be Paid...
America’s Syrian Civil War
A separatist movement is brewing in Canada
Modern Monetary Theory
An Open Letter to Treasury Secretary Bessent
Private Property and Customer Safety: Starbucks Learns a...
Game Theory
Learning from the Caribbean CBDC Experience
States Are Streamlining Licensing—ICE Is Kicking In Windows
Trump Has Completely Dropped His “Populist” Act
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
DailyProfitTips.com
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • World News
Editor's PickInvesting

Emergency Powers Are for Emergencies

by July 1, 2025
July 1, 2025

Jeffrey Miron

trump inauguration

On June 3, Keith Johnson of Foreign Policy speculated that the Trump administration, after two bruising court defeats, was eyeing Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act—a clause that has never been used—to keep its tariff war alive. The provision allows for up to 15 percent tariffs to address “balance-of-payment” emergencies, barring Congress from intervention for up to five months.

Trade is just one sector in which Congress has granted the president virtually unilateral authority; similar cases include immigration and industrial policy. Both followed a similar script, with presidents granted broad powers for catastrophes both real and imagined. 

This creeping presidential latitude did not appear overnight; its roots trace to the Founding era, when Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist 70 extolled the virtues of “energy in the executive.” Hamilton argued that providing the executive with some leeway would buy Congress time as it gathered and deliberated; speed, not policy preference, was to be the motive. Now, however, presidents use the freedom Congress has afforded them to circumvent legislative deadlocks and strong-arm trading partners. What began as a fire axe behind glass has turned into a Swiss army knife for routine politics.

That evolution is easy to spot in the historical record. The 1950 Defense Production Act, born to rush steel and rubber to Korea, now underwrites peacetime interventions from baby-formula shortages to COVID-19 swabs. Moreover, Section 232 of the 1962 Trade Expansion Act, intended to keep Soviet metal out of missile silos, propped up the 2018 tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. These episodes show how emergency statutes—drafted for specific, short-lived crises—can balloon into standing licenses far beyond their original scope. At the same time, Hamilton’s argument may have an element of truth—perhaps a few situations do require swift executive action. So when, if ever, should Congress delegate “emergency” power to the president?

Identifying hard-and-fast rules for executive authority is difficult, but certain changes might help: replacing elastic phrases like “national security” or “balance-of-payments” with concrete triggers; setting sunset dates that restore powers to Congress; and requiring presidents to identify why their actions meet statutory triggers. None of these measures is foolproof, but they potentially restore a measure of oversight without sacrificing the speed that Hamilton wanted.

A more aggressive reform would eliminate emergency powers entirely (since some presidents will inevitably cross anything less than a bright line). The objection to this approach is that, in some cases, a president might genuinely need emergency power. In those instances, however, Congress will likely vote such power quickly, since in true emergencies the facts are clear and convincing. This is what happened in response to Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. The first fleet of Japanese bombers and fighters attacked at 1:48 p.m. EST on December 7, 1941; Congress voted for a declaration of war at 12:30 p.m. EST on December 8, less than 24 hours later. More broadly, the country thrived for many decades before the creation of most emergency powers. It can do so as well, going forward.

This article appeared on Substack on July 1, 2025. Jonah Karafiol, a student at Harvard College, co-wrote this post.

previous post
NFA to resume corn procurement
next post
Ruling Against Ohio Scholarship Program Puts System Above Students

Related Posts

Learning from the Caribbean CBDC Experience

July 24, 2025

States Are Streamlining Licensing—ICE Is Kicking In Windows

July 24, 2025

PAGCOR first-half gross gaming revenue hits P215B

July 24, 2025

Davao bus project targeted for pilot operations in...

July 24, 2025

Hotel industry urges traveler-safety focus in promoting PHL...

July 24, 2025

Employers warned against coercing workers to show up...

July 24, 2025

SES in talks to bring satellite telco coverage...

July 24, 2025

PHL corn output seen rising on improved pest...

July 24, 2025

2024 healthcare spending rises to 5.9% of GDP

July 24, 2025

Chairman Lee, other officers take charge at FPI

July 24, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 DailyProfitTips.com All Rights Reserved.

    DailyProfitTips.com
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • World News