Trending Now
Friday Feature: Thales Academy
Why Governments Burned Money
Why Governments Burned Money
Are Stablecoins CBDCs in Disguise? No
Tanenhaus and God at Buckley
Tanenhaus and God at Buckley
Jefferson Davis von Hayek?
Jefferson Davis von Hayek?
Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held...
Mother O’ Mercy! Is This the End of...
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
DailyProfitTips.com
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • World News
Editor's PickInvesting

Skinner v. Louisiana Brief: Prosecutors Must Be Held Accountable for Withholding Exculpatory Evidence

by July 31, 2025
July 31, 2025

Matthew Cavedon and Laura Bondank

supreme court

Michael Wearry and James Skinner were convicted of the same murder more than twenty years ago. In 2016, the Supreme Court vacated Wearry’s conviction, finding that the prosecution’s failure to disclose material evidence in accordance with Brady v. Maryland violated Wearry’s due process rights. Following Wearry’s success, Skinner brought his own claim for postconviction relief, arguing that the Brady violations at issue in Wearry’s case likewise tainted his trial. But in a cursory two-page opinion, the Louisiana district court denied Skinner’s request and distinguished Wearry’s case without much explanation.

The rule established in Brady v. Maryland requires prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence prior to trial. Despite the Supreme Court’s clear instructions, Brady violations remain one of the most common and most serious types of prosecutorial misconduct. Recent studies reveal that prosecutors often intentionally violate Brady but almost never face consequences. This crisis of accountability for prosecutors, combined with institutional pressures to achieve high conviction rates, encourages noncompliance with Brady and results in wrongful convictions.

This problem is compounded by the dominance of plea bargaining, which has usurped the jury trial as the most common method of resolving criminal cases. Courts remain split on whether Brady applies to plea bargaining, and prosecutors often require pleading defendants to waive their right to challenge their convictions on appeal. If defendants lack confidence that any trial they receive will be fair, due to the government withholding exculpatory evidence, they will be even more likely to forgo trial and plead guilty.

Cato has filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to grant Skinner’s petition, vacate his sentence, and remand for a new trial. Doing so would reaffirm that compliance with Brady is a constitutional imperative, not a discretionary practice, and reinforce the safeguards needed to guarantee due process.

previous post
Mother O’ Mercy! Is This the End of the Cal Bullet Train?
next post
Jefferson Davis von Hayek?

Related Posts

Friday Feature: Thales Academy

August 1, 2025

Are Stablecoins CBDCs in Disguise? No

August 1, 2025

A Good Start: Congress Cuts Funding for USAID...

July 31, 2025

Trump Punishes Brazilian Censor in Chief, But Tariffs...

July 31, 2025

Infrastructure spending expected to accelerate after election pause

July 31, 2025

Exporters left in the dark after Marcos silence...

July 31, 2025

BCDA approves new BSP complex in Clark

July 31, 2025

VAT filing deadline extended for foreign digital providers

July 31, 2025

P5-B Lemery, Batangas logistics hub completed

July 31, 2025

Gov’t scientists develop ASF rapid test kits

July 31, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 DailyProfitTips.com All Rights Reserved.

    DailyProfitTips.com
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • World News