Trending Now
Sunset FEMA Aid and Return Disaster Responsibility to...
When Must the Feds Come to Court With...
US-China Deal Leaves the Big Questions Unanswered
IEEPA Tariffs: Not an Essential Foreign Policy Tool
The Supreme Court Should Strike Down the Trump...
Why Aren’t More Health Policy Commentators Libertarians?
Trump’s Tariff Power Grab
Ending Trump’s IEEPA Tariffs Would Bolster Manufacturing and...
The Seen and the Unseen in Criminal Justice
Another Regime-Change War Will Accelerate America’s Slide into...
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
DailyProfitTips.com
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • World News
Editor's PickInvesting

Some Inconvenient Truths for Climate Radicals

by October 13, 2025
October 13, 2025

Travis Fisher

I joined Congressman Dan Crenshaw on his Hold These Truths podcast to talk about climate policy, energy reality, and the Department of Energy climate report I helped coordinate under Secretary Chris Wright.

I pointed out how climate science—especially in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s technical chapters—is full of uncertainties and caveats, while the summaries and headlines strip out all nuance. For example, climate sensitivity estimates still span a wide range after decades of modeling. At the same time, we absolutely should acknowledge that human activity has climate impacts.

We also discussed the realities that most people never hear about, such as the dramatic decline in climate-related deaths due to energy abundance and adaptation. Reliable energy saves lives.

From there, we dug into the legal keystone that supports the set of federal regulations on CO₂: the 2009 endangerment finding. I walked through how Massachusetts v. EPA pushed the agency to treat CO₂ as a pollutant, which opened the door to economy-wide regulation. With Chevron gone and the Major Questions Doctrine in place, I argued the legal landscape presents an opportunity to revisit Mass v. EPA.

We also discussed how the growing demand has shattered the old assumption that efficiency could reduce electricity use and how Biden-era rules were a de facto ban on power plants just when we needed more of them.

We ended on a potential area for bipartisan agreement: permitting. If we want abundant, reliable energy at the least cost, we have to let entrepreneurs build.

The conversation boiled down to this: climate change is real, but climate policies involve trade-offs. We should remember what makes us prosperous and resilient to climate change today: freedom, innovation, human ingenuity, and energy abundance.

previous post
Joel Mokyr Wins Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences
next post
Constitutional Reform in Jamaica: Sentiment or Substance?

Related Posts

Sunset FEMA Aid and Return Disaster Responsibility to...

November 5, 2025

When Must the Feds Come to Court With...

November 4, 2025

US-China Deal Leaves the Big Questions Unanswered

November 4, 2025

IEEPA Tariffs: Not an Essential Foreign Policy Tool

November 4, 2025

The Supreme Court Should Strike Down the Trump...

November 4, 2025

Why Aren’t More Health Policy Commentators Libertarians?

November 4, 2025

Ending Trump’s IEEPA Tariffs Would Bolster Manufacturing and...

November 4, 2025

The Seen and the Unseen in Criminal Justice

November 4, 2025

How the CDC Lost Its Way—and Who’s Doing...

November 4, 2025

Floor price for live hogs set at P210...

November 4, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
    • About Us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 DailyProfitTips.com All Rights Reserved.

    DailyProfitTips.com
    • Editor’s Pick
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • World News